It seems the safest to ask "not a single tree to be cut down", but this is because the tree I want to talk about is not the same as the tree in your heart. A sort of. What you are thinking about is the ecosystem that should be protected and placed in nature, that is, natural forest; what I am talking about is the ecosystem that is cut down and renewed for the purpose of production and living resources, that is, artificial forest. Everyone can talk about the ideal that natural forests and artificial forests should coexist, co-prosper and support each other, but it is very difficult to implement them at the implementation level.
Because what counts whatsapp database as a natural forest and what counts as a plantation forest, even if the competent authorities have set standards, everyone still has their own subjective views. Forest guardians often regard the utilization of wood resources in artificial forests as logging, or mistake the former artificial forests (such as coniferous plantations that were planted in large quantities during the Japanese occupation era) as natural forests and blindly protect them. Utopia. But we still need to use wood. It is reasonable not to cut down natural forests, but even artificial forests are not allowed to be cut down, and EIA checks are required. What should we do? So there is a more fake Wenqing idea.
Since wood is used, it is fine to import it, so why cut down your own forest? Forest Trail Hiking and Climbing Liu Kexiang Documentary Photo Credit: WebMD Unfortunately, this idea is wrong. This is a kind of logic of "dead Taoist friends don't die and poor Taoism", the loss is the sustainable development of the local forest, as well as the possibility of the development of the local wood industry. The utilization of forest and woodland is differentiated, and they are divided into nature reserves, national security areas, forest recreation areas, and forest management areas.